Smith College's Moodle
Search results: 785

This course provides comparative analysis of the politics and socio-economic issues of Southeast Asian states while recognizing both the patterns and diversity of the region. As a region of the world, Southeast Asia is often overlooked existing in the shadow of larger actors in the Asia-Pacific region. However, this region has been a historically contested by the major powers of the world and has exerted important influences on global politics. Southeast Asian countries experienced centuries of colonial rule both directly and indirectly. In the early twentieth century, decolonization, the rise of nationalism, and communism transformed the region’s political systems in fundamental ways. The Cold War, during which the United States and the Soviet Union competed on a global scale, also divided the region along political lines which shaped the social and political development of the states in the region that still resonate to this day.
Furthermore, industrialization and rapid economic growth transformed many countries from peasant societies to modern, urban, and industrial countries. Yet the vast political and economic changes occurred unevenly both across the region, as well as within the countries themselves, resulting in various modes of contention from protest to civil war, some of which are still ongoing. All these forces of change have greatly influenced the political systems in the region, the ways that groups and individuals participate in politics, and the function of political institutions.
- Instructor: Cheng Xu

Since the end of the Second World War, there has been an enormous growth in the number of NGOs active globally, some working across borders on issues as diverse as poverty, health, women’s rights, and emergency relief. Both international and national NGOs have taken on new roles in areas once considered the domain of the government. NGOs are seen as the best way of promoting human/civil/minority rights and even socio-economic development in a post-Cold War era. They have become one of the hallmarks of post-Cold War international relations. This course elaborates on how NGOs became crucial actors in world politics and examines their growing and changing role.
The course has three parts. In the first part, we will explore the definition and purpose of NGOs and their history. In the second part, we will focus on NGOs’ authority, funding, and the critiques leveled at them: Do they do more harm than good? Are they impinging on the state’s ability to do its job? What is their role as civic advocates and service providers? Do they undermine local and political struggles for social justice? The last part will be devoted to case studies of NGOs from different parts of the world to understand the relationship between the contexts, networks, and strategies they use to foster their role in world politics.
- Instructor: Zümray Kutlu
COLLOQUIUM: REFUGEE POLITICS
In this course, we will examine the political dynamics of refugees and the changing nature of forced migration. Millions of people have been forced to move from their homes due to different factors including persecution, armed conflict, natural disasters, socioeconomic deprivation, and development projects. By exploring the nature, causes, and consequences of contemporary forced migration waves, this course will examine the relationship between forced migration and politics in the modern international system. The course provides a foundational understanding of and critical engagement with key theories, concepts, issues, and debates in refugee studies. In addition to international relations theory, we will also focus on historical studies, international law, migration and refugee studies, and anthropological approaches to displacement. Participants will engage in academic debates and watch documentaries/films on forced migration. Although special attention is devoted to the Middle East, other cases from different parts of the world will also be examined.
- Instructor: Zümray Kutlu
The political thought of the 19th century was directed towards understanding and shaping the clashing waves of human emancipation and reaction that defined the era. From the republican revolutions at the end of the 18th century to the struggles over labor at the end of the 19th, powerful forces both receded in the face of struggles for freedom and subsequently overwhelmingly flowed against them. All the while, political thinkers – themselves often engaged in these struggles – attempted to describe and shape these clashes to their own ends. For them, this era brought forth a “world that is totally new” (Tocqueville) and a condition in which the human “spirit has broken with the world it has hitherto inhabited and imagined” (Hegel). Accordingly, 19th century political theorists took it as their task to develop a new, modern understanding of political life, which would not “draw its poetry from the past, but only from the future” (Marx). Struggles for freedom opened the 19th century, but what would be the meaning and extent of that freedom?
In this course, we will read classic texts by some of these thinkers from the European and American contexts by focusing on four major themes which define the four parts of the course. The first part of the course will read three theorists who respectively celebrated, rejected, or reconciled themselves to the new political world which followed the French Revolution. The next part will turn our attention to the American context. After two short pieces by European theorists that attempt to define the spirit of modernity, we will read political texts from three figures of the Transcendentalist movement who each attempted to understand the spiritual life of the individual in modern politics. The third part of the course will analyze the tensions of freedom and slavery in 19th century America, one of the most important settings for the struggle over the meaning of modern freedom. Finally, the last part will take up texts that consider the meaning and possible extent of emancipation, particularly with respect to labor and gender. During each of these parts we will be concerned with the same set of questions that beguiled the 19th century, but with different priority given in each module. What is the spirit of revolution? What is the meaning of modernity? What is the full experience of freedom and why do some claim that it requires the unfreedom of others? And how would it be possible to bring about a full, complete form of human emancipation? These questions are not be merely antiquarian but are also aimed towards gaining a better understanding of the tensions of freedom and unfreedom which still persist in our own world today.
Finally, the assignment structure for this course will include regular participation, four short reflective essays, and a research paper. Please see the tentative syllabus uploaded here for more details.
- Instructor: Kye Barker
- Instructor: Sara Newland
- Instructor: Sara Newland
The idea that citizens are obliged to obey the laws under which they live is an old one, but it is not clear on what basis this obligation rests or if it ever obtains in the real world conditions of complex societies, imperfect regimes, and unintended consequences – let alone systemic injustice, social inequality, political domination, and other forms of oppression. Indeed, the practices of dissent, protest, disobedience, and resistance are at least as old – and are arguably no less foundational than obligation to concepts of political authority, legitimacy, and democracy. Moreover, examining the history of democracy seems to reveal that illegal, disruptive, and sometimes violent movements have played a significant role in contesting injustice, confronting inequality, and democratizing institutions. On the other hand, history also reveals to us the way that the upheaval of collective resistance can also give way to brutality, bloodshed, and chaotic destabilization.
How do we make sense of the idea of political obligation in the face of injustice? What role does disobedience play in political society? How do we make room for dissent, disobedience, and resistance while remaining attentive to the political, ethical, and moral risks that such actions carry? What are the political and ethical obligations to which we might be subject as citizens of a polity? What is the depth of obedience and what are the bounds of dissent? What is the nature of injustice, and what kinds of injustices demand dissenting action?
This course will take up these questions through an examination and discussion of core texts in political theory alongside works written by (and about) some of the most influential historical practitioners of civil disobedience: Henry David Thoreau on the subject of conscience in the face of chattel slavery; MK Gandhi on nonviolence in the fight for Indian independence; and Martin Luther King on segregation, law, and racial injustice. Throughout the semester we will consider the ethical and tactical problems posed by disobedience, protest, resistance, and action – and how theorists’ and practitioners’ views of injustice, responsibility, law, action, and ethics relate to their ideas about obligation, injustice, and disobedience. We will end the course by discussing the ethical and political stakes of civility, as well as violence and nonviolence.
- Instructor: Erin Pineda
- Instructor: Sara Newland
- Instructor: Alice Hearst
- Instructor: Alice Hearst
- Instructor: Gregory White
- Instructor: Kye Barker
- Instructor: Dennis Yasutomo
- Instructor: Brent Durbin